Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nutrition. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

Merry Christmas!

We've been working out pretty hard here in Iowa. We got in on Monday and pretty much just used that as a warmup day. Tuesday Scott managed to do the following in record time.

"Sugar"

As many rounds as possible in 30 min of:

5 Peanut Brittle
10 Sugared Walnuts
3 Cookies
1 glass Egg Nog

SS: 14 + some chile and chocolate
AS: 8 + some crackers

We were on pace to do a bit better, but Adrienne crashed near round 6 and Scott got distracted at round 12 by a card game, or a TV on. Nicely surprised that the egg nog was a little diluted and managed to help the rest slide down until about round 5, after which the nog was getting pretty heavy. Pushups were the weak link.

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Get fat!

Good fats of course, those being ω-3 fatty acids (a type of polyunsaturated fatty acid [PUFA], another being the ω-6 fatty acids; these are also referred to as n-3 and n-6 fatty acids). Members of these families are derived from the essential fatty acids linoleate (LA) and α-linolenate (LNA). Strictly speaking, these two are the only essential fatty acids (required through diet), although that term is often extended to the entire family of PUFAs (Cunnane, 2003). The ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids are critical for a host of bodily functions, which you can read about in reviews by Das (2006) and Wijendran and Hayes (2004). Very roughly speaking ω-6 fatty acids are pro-inflammatory whereas ω-3 fatty acids are anti-inflammatory. More specifically, the ω-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are antithrombotic and antiarryhthmic, and dietary intake of these fatty acids is associated with reduced risk of death from cardiovascular disease.

Although current evidence indicates that the relative dietary ratios of ω-3 and ω-6 fatty acids is a indicator for overall health (Wijendran and Hayes 2004; Simopoulos, 2002), the mechanisms by which EPA and DHA reduce the risk of cardiac mortality remain unclear. The assumption is that direct incorporation of these fatty acids into the myocardium of the heart underlies their health benefits. That dietary intake directly modulates myocardial phospholipid profile was recently documented by Metcalf et al. (2007). The authors examined the atrial tissue of people undergoing elective cardiac surgery following varying durations of dietary supplementation with fish oil (6 g EPA+DHA/day, for 7-60 days). They found that fish oil supplementation increased the amount of EPA and DHA in the cell membranes of both atrial tissue as well as red blood cells.


It has been proposed that the cardioprotective effects of EPA and DHA result from replacement of arachidonic acid (AA) in cardiac membranes. AA is a precursor of a wide array of eicosanoids (Funk, 2001). These compounds promote inflammatory responses, platelet aggregation, and vasoconstriction. Although these are essential metabolic functions, excess AA-derived eicosanoids can promote atherosclerotic disease and thrombosis.

Source: Calder 2006.

Metcalf et al. also showed that dietary fish oil supplementation reduced atrial AA concentrations, consistent with the idea that part of the benefit of EPA and DHA may be due to the reduction in AA-derived pro-inflammatory factors.


These phosphospholipid adaptations in atrial tissue may thus underlie the cardioprotective effects of dietary fish oil. In support of this, the timescale and magnitude of these changes is broadly consistent with the observation that the protective effects of ω-3 fatty acid supplementation begin early, but reach significance only after about three months.


Also of note is the fact that supplementing with flaxseed oil (high in ALA) did not result in any changes in ω-3 fatty acid concentrations. This is likely due to the fact that dietary ALA is converted to EPA and DHA at extremely low rates (Plourde & Cunnane 2007), which is consistent with suggestions that ALA supplementation is not cardioprotective (Matthan et al. 2005; Wang et al. 2006).

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Nut fats

In case you were wondering about the fat profile of nuts (I was cause I just ate 600 calories of cashews):

Source

Monday, October 1, 2007

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Fat profiles of cooking oils

Ran out of olive oil today, and before downing some canola oil (2 tbsp ~240 calories), I found a couple of nice charts illustrating the fat profiles of lots of cooking oils:

Includes some more exotic oils:
A different view in terms of absolute value:

To the future:
A very informative post on cooking oils here.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Fat states

From this article courtesy of the CalorieLab.

Maybe it has something to do with this:CNN coverage of this recent article. Go figure, kids prefer food wrapped in a McDonald's wrapper... Well, it's not quite the right experiment, but you get the idea.

Interestingly, the National Broadcasting Commission of Thailand is about to finalize restrictions on junk food ads for children. The proposed measures include a ban on junk food ads during children's programmes; prohibiting the use of children, cartoon characters, entertainers or celebrities as ad presenters; prohibiting marketing promotions using giveaways and lucky draws; and requiring ads to warn against consuming the products more than twice a day. Source

Edited (082207) to add a link:
What is the Right Way to Think About the Obesity ‘Epidemic’?
and the World Fatness Chart:
Check out other awesome illustrations by Wellington Grey.

Tuesday, August 7, 2007



Just a reminder that fat has a purpose...

Thursday, July 19, 2007

I think my energy demands are going up


Last night, I had a complete, 2 hour long dream that consisted solely of eating potato chips...

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Saturday, July 7, 2007

Eat those fruits and vegetables!

First in a series devoted to reducing risks of death.
If you had any doubt that eating fruits and vegetables is beneficial to your health, maybe some data will convince you.
Sidebar: You can skip this on first read, but here are some links to potentially unfamiliar terms. If you aren't familiar with study designs, have a quick here. If you aren't used to thinking about relative risk (don't confuse them with odds ratios), have a look here. Most of the data presented below came from prospective cohort studies with large cohorts and long-term follow ups. I chose primarily meta-analyses to get better power and lower bias (although you may want to check the citations to see the specifics of how studies were selected for inclusion).
The figure below summarizes a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (Hu & Willett, 2002) examining the effect of eating nuts, fruits and vegetables or whole grains on cardiovascular disease. The relative risks were derived from the comparison of the incidence rates between the highest and lowest consumption groups (quintiles, quartiles or specific intake categories as per specific study) and were adjusted for nondietary and/or dietary covariates. These are huge effects.

So it's pretty clear that eating nuts, fruits and vegetables or whole grains can reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the comparison above is basically between eating lots versus eating little of any of these food categories. You might be wondering whether there is a dose-dependence for reducing risk. The following figure comes from another meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (He et al., 2007), and focuses on fruit and vegetables. Here the risk ratios were derived from comparing the highest categories of fruit and vegetable consumers (3-5 servings/day and >5 servings per day) against lower intakes (<3 and="" cardiovascular="" class="separator" day="" disease.="" div="" eat="" fruits="" group="" lower="" more="" of="" risk="" servings="" style="clear: both; text-align: center;" the="" vegetables="" you="" your=""> What about other diseases? Well, it probably shouldn't surprise you that eating fruits and vegetables also reduces your risk of stroke, the third leading cause of death (nipping at the heels of CHD and cancer). The figure below summarizes a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (He et al., 2006) on the effects of eating fruits and vegetables on stroke. Note that were looking only at the top consumers (as in the immediately preceding figure). Again, we're seeing a nice dose-dependent effect of eating fruits and vegetables on reducing your risk of stroke (both ischaemic and haemorrhagic).
This dose-dependence is more clearly illustrated in a similar meta-analysis (Dauechet et al., 2005). The following is a summary figure, which further breaks down the data by fruits alone, vegetables alone and fruits+vegetables. The size of the bubbles is inversely proportional to the variance of the relative risk of each study, bigger bubbles=more reliable study. Looks like it "eat your fruits and vegetables, but more of those fruits".
I'm off to eat a bushel of apples.

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Brain food

Food for thought is an interesting review by anthropologist William Leonard covering the idea that shifts in food preferences over the course of human evolution were driven by the requirements of bigger brains, which itself may have been driven by climate induced ecosystem change. A more in depth review by Leonard and colleagues with references to the primary literature: Effects of Brain Evolution on Human Nutrition and Metabolism.

The work of primatolgist Katherine Milton provides very good background reading. The Critical Role Played by Animal Source Foods in Human (Homo) Evolution is a good place to start.

Some nice images here.

Saturday, June 9, 2007

Saturday round-up

Nice post on freezing fish. Maggie's mention of flash-frozen fish prompted me to buy several pounds of fish to try out; it's a hell of a lot cheaper than fresh fish but I'm skeptical that it will taste as good. Check out the rest of the blog (Atom feed), it's pretty informative and amusing (e.g., great photo tutorial on cooking whole fish and all of these amazing recipes).

What the world eats (TIME photoessay). Click the link or the photo to go see the whole series. It's really neat. This is my favorite:
Here are links to some articles about diet/disease/health that have caught my attention:

Some novel hypotheses from Frank Booth here and here. The cycling hypothesis is interesting, particularly so in light of the recent work by Mattson on caloric restriction and intermittent fasting. Background reading on paleolithic and hunter-gatherer diets can be found here. A discussion specific to dietary levels of protein can be found here.

My current macro-breakdown according to


"Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out"
- Richard Feynman

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall by the Wayside

An interesting article in the NYTimes on obesity and getting screwed in the genetic lottery.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

You Are What You Grow

An interesting article in the NY Times Magazine by Michael Pollan, exploring the politics of farming and its affect on our food supply and costs.
A provocative figure from Drewknowski and Darmon,

The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost (2005).
Related information from the Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy.

Sunday, April 8, 2007

I think I took 3 weeks off my life this weekend


Interesting recent articles in the NYT and New York magazine about calorie restriction, which seems to not only increase lifespan in laboratory animals, but also mitigate cancer, cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease.

One thing to remember, though, even if CR affects human longevity - these are controlled environments, and the decline in functional strength that comes with CR may have serious consequences in the real world.

If you don't really buy the effect of CR - or don't care - then I highly recommend Daisy May's BBQ over on the west side.

Oink oink...